{"id":75,"date":"2021-07-20T13:31:04","date_gmt":"2021-07-20T17:31:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/iterudio.com\/?p=75"},"modified":"2021-07-20T13:31:04","modified_gmt":"2021-07-20T17:31:04","slug":"the-immigrant-charlie-chaplin-1917","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.iterudio.com\/?p=75","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;The Immigrant&#8221; &#8211; Charlie Chaplin 1917"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>disfluencies<\/strong><br \/>My <em>&#8220;amateur hour&#8221;<\/em> production of commentary while watching &#8220;The Immigrant&#8221; fell victim to volume mixing.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>The &#8220;learning curve&#8221; lesson is that &#8220;while I&#8217;m streaming\/recording&#8221; <strong>I<\/strong> don&#8217;t hear the sound that is going to the stream &#8211; so the music volume on the movie was too high making the recording of my commentary unusable.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>File this one under &#8220;learning experience&#8221; &#8211; not a big deal. I could have easily re-recorded the commentary, and it would <strong><em>PROBABLY<\/em><\/strong> have been better the second time around.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>I continue to work on curbing my &#8220;<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/disfluency\" target=\"_blank\">filler words<\/a>.&#8221; Occasionally I&#8217;ll hear someone point out that too many &#8220;filler words&#8221; makes you sound unintelligent (or, they probably say &#8220;stupid&#8221; &#8211; and I just realized how successfully I have weaned myself from using THAT word).<\/p>\n\n\n<p>ANYWAY, having been &#8220;paid to talk to a captive audience about a subject I have extensive knowledge&#8221; (some call it &#8220;teaching&#8221;) &#8211; I always point out that <strong>MY<\/strong> filler word usage is directly related to how prepared I am for the lecture\/talk.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Still it is something I need to work on &#8230;<\/p>\n\n\n<p><strong>The Immigrant<\/strong><br \/>Random thoughts\/Interesting elements from &#8220;The Immigrant&#8221;:<\/p>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>the &#8220;short feature&#8221; (20ish minutes) is considered an example of Chaplin at his best<\/li><li>the criticism of the short centers around the fact that it feels like two 10-minute stories, rather than one 20 minute story (on the boat, then in the restaurant)<\/li><li>the female lead (<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm0701012\/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t2\" target=\"_blank\">Edna Purviance<\/a>) was Chaplin&#8217;s &#8220;discovery&#8221; &#8211; and became his most frequent lead actress<\/li><li>yes, they were romantically linked at one point &#8211; Charlie Chaplin was married 4 times, and some have pointed out that maybe if Chaplin had married Edna he wouldn&#8217;t have had all the problems associated with &#8220;4 wives&#8221; &#8211; well, at least it is pretty to think so<\/li><li>Chaplin did keep Ms Purviance on the &#8220;payroll&#8221; after she retired &#8211; so it gets pointed out that Chaplin treated Edna better than he did his ex-wives<\/li><li>if there was a &#8220;dominant trait&#8221; for comedy in the first half of the 20th century &#8211; it would (probably) be &#8220;physical deformity&#8221; &#8211; not &#8220;handicaps&#8221; as much as limbs out of proportion\/twisted. Think &#8220;Popeye&#8221; &#8211; so &#8220;The Tramp&#8221; character taps into that <\/li><li>once you get past the &#8220;Tramp&#8217;s&#8221; funny walk, facial ticks, feet a little too large &#8211; Chaplin tends to be the &#8220;little guy testing authority figures&#8221; &#8211; which we see in the restaurant scene<\/li><li>the &#8220;head waiter&#8221; is played by <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm0132444\/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t3\" target=\"_blank\">Eric Campbell<\/a> &#8211; who played to &#8220;evil heavy&#8221; in 11 Chaplin shorts<\/li><li>obviously Chaplin and Campbell were friends in the &#8220;real world&#8221;<\/li><li>Campbell was 6&#8242; 5&#8243; tall which Chaplin (all of 5&#8242; 5&#8243; tall) expertly plays for comedic effect. <\/li><li>Campbell had something of a short and tragic life &#8211; he died in a traffic accident in 1917<\/li><li>the ending is interesting in a &#8220;formula&#8221; kind of way<\/li><li>formula 1 = <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Deus_ex_machina\" target=\"_blank\">deus ex machina<\/a>, Chaplin and Edna are painted into the proverbial corner, and suddenly the &#8220;wealthy artist&#8221; character appears &#8211; and provides the solution to their problems &#8211; this kind of &#8220;then a miracle occurs&#8221; plot resolution goes way back to the ancient Greek theater, so I&#8217;m not criticizing as much as point out the formula<\/li><li>formula 2 = Chaplin and Edna get married at the end. This &#8220;pairing up&#8221; formula tends to be part of &#8220;comedy endings&#8221; in general &#8211; in 2021 maybe everybody doesn&#8217;t get married, but they still &#8216;pair up&#8217; <\/li><li>Shakespeare is always the example I use to illustrate the second formula &#8211; e.g. in his &#8220;comedies&#8221; people get married at the end, in his &#8220;tragedies&#8221; people die at the end<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n<p><strong>done<\/strong><br \/>from a &#8220;making movies&#8221; point of view &#8211; Charlie Chaplin was breaking fresh ground. &#8220;Acting&#8221; on stage is a different craft than &#8220;acting&#8221; in movies, but remember &#8220;movie acting&#8221; had to be invented by the early actors and directors &#8211; which is kinda what we see in The Immigrant.<\/p>\n\n\n<p> &#8211; i.e. the Immigrant probably illustrates the development from &#8220;stage acting&#8221; (done with the body) to &#8220;movie acting&#8221; (done primarily with the eyes\/face). <\/p>\n\n\n<p>The film industry was also quickly disrupted by &#8220;sound.&#8221; For better or worse &#8212; With &#8220;talkies&#8221; you might have characters engage in dialogue to advance the plot (but too much &#8220;exposition&#8221; is ALWAYS being bad) &#8211; however &#8220;silent movies&#8221; force &#8220;visual storytelling.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Of course &#8220;show don&#8217;t tell&#8221; is still good &#8220;storytelling&#8221; advice &#8211; with &#8220;modern movies&#8221; the best practice is (probably) some form of &#8220;show <em>WHILE<\/em> telling&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n<p><strong>almost completely unrelated random thought<\/strong><br \/>John Ford (the legendary director) started out directing silent movies &#8211; and sometimes his movies tend toward &#8220;melodrama&#8221; BUT they are always great examples of &#8220;visual storytelling.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n<p>(random thought: John Ford deserves some of the credit for John Wayne&#8217;s success. How much is debatable &#8211; but I like to point out that the &#8220;John Wayne school of acting&#8221; involves &#8220;don&#8217;t say too much, just look and let the audience put in the emotion&#8221; &#8211; which I can easily imagine John Ford giving the Duke that advice while making <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0031971\/?ref_=fn_al_tt_2\" target=\"_blank\">Stagecoach<\/a> \ud83d\ude09 )<\/p>\n\n\n<p><strong>legendary<\/strong><br \/>&#8220;Motion pictures&#8221; helped speed the death of vaudeville &#8211; by syphoning off both talent and audiences, but it is always tough to say that &#8220;X&#8221; is the reason &#8220;Y&#8221; became unprofitable. <\/p>\n\n\n<p>With the popularity of &#8220;reality television&#8221; &#8211; which to me looks a lot like the old &#8220;talent shows&#8221; &#8211; which looked a lot like vaudeville &#8211; which stole a lot from the &#8220;stage&#8221; and &#8220;minstrel shows&#8221; &#8211; it is easy to say that there is still nothing new under the sun.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>However, reshaping and renewing &#8220;old classic&#8221; into &#8220;new classic&#8221; requires considerable talent &#8211; and that was Charlie Chaplin &#8230; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>disfluenciesMy &#8220;amateur hour&#8221; production of commentary while watching &#8220;The Immigrant&#8221; fell victim to volume mixing. The &#8220;learning curve&#8221; lesson is that &#8220;while I&#8217;m streaming\/recording&#8221; I don&#8217;t hear the sound that is going to the stream &#8211; so the music volume on the movie was too high making the recording of my commentary unusable. File this [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-75","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history","category-movies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iterudio.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iterudio.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iterudio.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iterudio.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iterudio.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=75"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.iterudio.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iterudio.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=75"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iterudio.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=75"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iterudio.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=75"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}